712whp Procharged Z06 - Tuner-Junction

njn63 · #1 (**permalink**) April 8th, 2006, 08:48 PM

Click here to see Video

Just further supporting what i want to buy after college.

Johnlude85 · #2 (**permalink**) April 8th, 2006, 09:08 PM

Rhythm Kid · #3 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 01:40 AM

Jesus....those things sound so scary with that amount of power...

on a off-topic note real fast..you see that video clip of the turbo saturn? right under it to the right?...watch it...and be outraged by how massivly gay they are.

DCxMagus · #4 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 02:41 AM

nah those guys are cool I talked to them when i had my turbo satty they just fucking around in that video, but that saturn is fucking fast!

Rhythm Kid · #5 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCxMagus

nah those guys are cool I talked to them when i had my turbo satty they just fucking around in that video, but that saturn is fucking fast!

interesting. I wouldn't touch a saturn as far as porformance goes. Other then the newer ones with the ecotec motors, i think they are kinda weak. A kid at my highschool turboed his saturn sedan and from what i hear its quick....for a saturn

Slam a snail on one of those ecotec motors though...then i wouldn't be so quick to talk shit... bah >.< but thats just me.

DCxMagus · #6 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 03:59 AM

I had a T3/T4 on my ION which is the 2.2L ecotec at 8 PSI with shit for fuel tuning I was running around 13.9 -14.1

carboncivic · #7 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njn63

Click here to see Video

Just further supporting what i want to buy.

+1 for some mean power

Blake · #8 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 10:53 AM

holy moly

scottigee · #9 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 11:01 AM

holy loping idle...sick sounding motor.

jadkar · #10 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 11:21 AM

Unreal!!!!

Just to give you some quantitative numbers on all this HP (I'm doing this at the crank with a 15% loss) .......

My CRX:
2100lbs -> 309hp == 6.8lbs/HP

1997+ 3.2 NSX:
3100lbs -> 290hp == 10.7lbs/HP

KARs TL:
3400lbs -> 270HP == 12.6lbs/HP

1990 Stock CRX Si:
2000lbs -> 108HP == 18.5lbs/HP

2003 996 turbo:
3114lbs -> 420HP == 7.4lbs/HP

2004 Ferrari 360 Modena:
3197lbs -> 400HP == 7.9lbs/HP

That dude's sick ass supercharged Z06:
3150lbs -> 818HP == 3.9Lbs/HP!!!!!

Now of course this all has to do with gearing and HP. But seriously, can I hear a ....God Damn!!!!!!!

carboncivic · #11 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 11:42 AM

God Damn John!!!!! I am seriously torn between the project to start on, fwd hatch or a rwd torque monster.

jadkar · #12 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 12:01 PM

Honestly I have always loved our little hatchbacks, however we have always been limited by our displacement. Even my NSX which was way more $$$ then most Domestics only had a tiny little 3.2

In the 0-60, 1/4 mile game I don't care what anyone says...... there is no substitute for displacement. Of the late, tuners have been bolting big ass turbos to the 4 bangers and getting upwards of 800whp from them and that's impressive. However, what do you think happens when people start doing that to a 5.7lt Domestics

...... actually you saw what happens. Steve's Camaro with something like 1200hp, and that's nothing!!

If we can make 800hp out of a 2.0lt LS/VTEC then do the math. A 4.0 V8 should be able to pull 1600hp, and then a 5.7lt would be close to 2400hp. Now of course there's volumetric efficiency, flow rates, DOHC versus push-rod, etc. But let's just say the the same type of technology was applied to the Domestic large displacement engines......we'd see some scary stuff!!

carboncivic · #13 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 12:14 PM

exactly, that's why i'm keeping the SI as a daily driver, on to hunt for a clean older car for some experimentation. HINT* the cars in the sig are a few ideas*HINT

hcarcrx · #14 (**permalink**) April 9th, 2006, 08:13 PM

it looked slow!!!!

imperrsive!!!