Welcome to Tuner-Junction.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
August 14th, 2006, 07:39 PM
|
 |
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,079
|
|
|
GSR intake cam IS better for superchargers!!
Just to let you know I swapped the ITR intake cam for a GS-R one this morning. I still haven't re-tuned, Jeff's gonna do that for me on the 28th. However, as a preliminary opinion I definitely think it's a better cam combo for my setup.
When I had ITR intake and exhaust cam my boost would gradually increase from 6.0 psi at around 4K to 9.5 at 8000RPM. I would stay at 9.5 until red line (8600). Now with the GS-R intake I'm not developing more boost but I'm developing peak boost earlier. In other words at 4K RPM I'm at 8psi and it jumps quickly to 9.5psi.
The dyno will be the judge but I really think I picked up more HP lower in the RPM range which will work wonders for the uphill at Watkins Glen :thumbup:
Special thanks to Julio for just giving it to me no charge!!!
|
August 14th, 2006, 07:57 PM
|
|
Hells Wind Staff
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: the city of the O where the palm trees grow
Posts: 368
|
|
midrange torque ftw 
__________________
yea, im the nervous twitchy one 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ATISTANG
I would, but I have no standards so if its pink,warm, and wet I want to stab it |
|
August 14th, 2006, 07:59 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/RI
Posts: 639
|
|
glad you got that sorted...your torque curve should be beautiful now
__________________
BK - 1994 CD7
|
August 14th, 2006, 10:59 PM
|
|
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,079
|
|
^^
Yeah, it's all squared away. The torque curve was already super flat so now I can't wait to see what it's gonna look like!!
2 more weeks. Before I was running 8.0 psi and I was at 269whp. With 9.5 - 10psi and the new cam I'm hoping to be at 290whp. We'll see  |
August 14th, 2006, 11:05 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/RI
Posts: 639
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jadkar
^^
Yeah, it's all squared away. The torque curve was already super flat so now I can't wait to see what it's gonna look like!!
2 more weeks. Before I was running 8.0 psi and I was at 269whp. With 9.5 - 10psi and the new cam I'm hoping to be at 290whp. We'll see |
that should be doable
__________________
BK - 1994 CD7
|
August 14th, 2006, 11:08 PM
|
|
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,079
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by street_accord94
that should be doable |
If so I will most likely be the strongest SC 1.8 on the East coast. Right now LHT has the title with 281whp on 9.0psi |
August 14th, 2006, 11:10 PM
|
|
Hells Wind Staff
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: the city of the O where the palm trees grow
Posts: 368
|
|
|
just wondering, did you ever post a dyno plot?
__________________
yea, im the nervous twitchy one
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ATISTANG
I would, but I have no standards so if its pink,warm, and wet I want to stab it |
|
August 14th, 2006, 11:10 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/RI
Posts: 639
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jadkar
If so I will most likely be the strongest SC 1.8 on the East coast. Right now LHT has the title with 281whp on 9.0psi
|
that brings up something ive been curious about and meaning to ask you on the board...
LHT makes their own SC header designs, but does the kamikaze outperform that?
__________________
BK - 1994 CD7
|
August 14th, 2006, 11:22 PM
|
|
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,079
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by street_accord94
that brings up something ive been curious about and meaning to ask you on the board...
LHT makes their own SC header designs, but does the kamikaze outperform that?
|
I'm not sure, however I do know that Endyn (god of supercharger technology) uses Kamikaze headers that they port on their own setups. That's good enough for me.
eezeede - Yes I did post it , but just for you here it is again. Keep in mind this was at 8.0 psi with the ITR intake cam.
 |
August 14th, 2006, 11:24 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/RI
Posts: 639
|
|
|
any reason youre not running neptune?
__________________
BK - 1994 CD7
|
August 14th, 2006, 11:32 PM
|
|
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,079
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by street_accord94
any reason youre not running neptune?
|
Hondata S300 > Neptune
IMO |
August 15th, 2006, 12:02 AM
|
|
Hells Wind Staff
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: the city of the O where the palm trees grow
Posts: 368
|
|
|
that is a nice torque curve. its like what, 75% of peak torque at 2k rpm
__________________
yea, im the nervous twitchy one
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ATISTANG
I would, but I have no standards so if its pink,warm, and wet I want to stab it |
|
August 15th, 2006, 01:17 AM
|
 |
Boost Ninja
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central, NJ
Posts: 598
|
|
|
John you are going to be near 300whp....this time do some cam tuning as well..mgiht be able to get some extra ponies from it...
__________________
02 psm wrx.(blown motor) built motor in the process
89 crx HF..SOLD!!! 
05 toyota tundra sr5 4DR 4.7L v8
|
August 15th, 2006, 01:23 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/RI
Posts: 639
| | |
