Welcome to Tuner-Junction.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|

March 5th, 2006, 11:38 PM
|
 |
TJ Wanabe
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 60
|
|
|
Intake Veloicty
Ok, here's the story. My friend with a black 00 Si is considering get a y-tube for his intake piping. I'm having a hard enough time convencing him that cold-air intake design is better for topend and short-ram is better for low-mid (I even used the straw description). NOW I'm having trouble convencing him that if he uses his dual intake desing he's going to decrease velocity into the intake manifold because the turbulance that going to be created due to the intake drawing in air from two different points leading to the same pipe.
Here the desing. One route of the Y is goign to be SRAI the other will be CAI.
__________________
Moonlight Illusion
|

March 6th, 2006, 02:03 AM
|
 |
Made Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aurora Colorado
Posts: 144
|
|
|
thats going to be an unnecessary strain on the intake vacuum of the motor. He's defenitly not going to gain any power doing it
|

March 6th, 2006, 02:07 AM
|
 |
Made Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 128
|
|
|
indeed...with that set-up take your big starw theory and make that into a big ass 2 inch PVC pipe and try to suck in air. it wont work.
SRI > CAI
Last edited by +RandomHero+; March 6th, 2006 at 04:45 PM..
|

March 6th, 2006, 10:19 AM
|
 |
Boost Addict
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 447
|
|
|
yup... sounds pretty dumb.
if the straw description didn't work, your friend is a loss and you should just let him do it.
__________________
2001 Honda S2000
201.63 whp : 135.74 ft/lbs
|

March 6th, 2006, 11:03 AM
|
|
Ultimate Shield
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: RSM CA
Posts: 224
|
|
|
if you really wanted to tell him that if he gains power then you will pay the cost of the dynoing for both designs and if not he can pay the cost =P
that or let him do it and let him drive a less effencient car so people just won't listen no matter how much fact are against them
__________________
2000 Base prelude
AEM CAI
Pspec Shortshifter
more mods coming...
|

March 6th, 2006, 12:30 PM
|
 |
Made Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 128
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Clone
yup... sounds pretty dumb.
if the straw description didn't work, your friend is a loss and you should just let him do it.
|
indeed...another way to do this is get 2 straws. as big as you can get. but them in a cup of soda. then try to suck the soda to your mouth. its harder to do then with one straw.
but i agree with CLone
|

March 6th, 2006, 12:44 PM
|
 |
Boostless peasant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 731
|
|
|
the pro's and con's from a CAI and a SR are going to be negligible anyway. Its not saying that is going to lose the race for you. But yea, y-pipe is dumb.
|

March 6th, 2006, 12:52 PM
|
|
Noob
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 35
|
|
|
IMO short ram in the way to go.
and to thread starter you have it backwards. the CAI is better int he mid range whereas the SRI is better for top end.
SRI: less bends, shorter piping, less air resistance producing a very laminar flow in the pipe, which leads to higher rpm efficiency
CAI: another bend or two, longer piping (at least 2x as long), the bends will cause a stir with a more turbulent flow at higher rpm, where at lower the bends don't have as much of a swirl affect and due to the ideal resistance for the piping causes a "hump" in the hp in the mid range of rpm's.
but the Y tube is just dumb unless its designed perfectly for a very powerful motor and i seriously doubt that
EDIT: but if you were to look at dyno charts of the sri and cai the only difference is in the mid range. the top end power was occasionally higher in the sri.....especially on cars reving over 8K
|

March 6th, 2006, 03:35 PM
|
 |
TJ Wanabe
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 60
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 98CivicEK
IMO short ram in the way to go.
and to thread starter you have it backwards. the CAI is better int he mid range whereas the SRI is better for top end.
SRI: less bends, shorter piping, less air resistance producing a very laminar flow in the pipe, which leads to higher rpm efficiency
CAI: another bend or two, longer piping (at least 2x as long), the bends will cause a stir with a more turbulent flow at higher rpm, where at lower the bends don't have as much of a swirl affect and due to the ideal resistance for the piping causes a "hump" in the hp in the mid range of rpm's.
but the Y tube is just dumb unless its designed perfectly for a very powerful motor and i seriously doubt that
EDIT: but if you were to look at dyno charts of the sri and cai the only difference is in the mid range. the top end power was occasionally higher in the sri.....especially on cars reving over 8K
|
I thought i had it right, that's what I've always read anyway. Thanks for correcting me if your correct.
He has decided to do it. He said when he proves me wrong he'll call me.
Yep
__________________
Moonlight Illusion
|

March 6th, 2006, 07:59 PM
|
|
Noob
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 35
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Moon Ill
I thought i had it right, that's what I've always read anyway. Thanks for correcting me if your correct.
He has decided to do it. He said when he proves me wrong he'll call me.
Yep
|
i wouldn't sit by the phone.
|

March 6th, 2006, 09:02 PM
|
|
Ultimate Shield
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: RSM CA
Posts: 224
|
|
|
how is he going to prove you wrong?
Last time I checked "butt dynos" don't hold up in the court of law =P
__________________
2000 Base prelude
AEM CAI
Pspec Shortshifter
more mods coming...
|

March 6th, 2006, 09:05 PM
|
 |
Boostless peasant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 731
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DCxMagus
how is he going to prove you wrong?
Last time I checked "butt dynos" don't hold up in the court of law =P
|
thats for damn sure.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.
|