Welcome to Tuner-Junction.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|

August 5th, 2007, 05:42 PM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
|
b18b built for boost
the stock b18b numbers are not high enough.
b18b polished block
darton full sleved closed deck 84mm
manley rods
cp coated pistons 8.5:1
lower cradle
fully arp studed
micro polished crank
acl race bearings
ported and polished
ferrea valves/spring/retainers
crower turbo cams
want some stupid numbers for shows...and to humiliate some people along the way. mostly the V8s. hope to have in by nopi nationals, but not rushing.
|

August 5th, 2007, 06:34 PM
|
|
Hells Wind Staff
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
|
|
|
What numbers is that setup developing currently?
__________________

30th Anniversary Camaro Z28: K&N CAI, PaceSetter LT's, ORY, Deleted Cats, Magnaflow Cat-back, B&M Shift Kit
|

August 5th, 2007, 07:20 PM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
|
243whp, 236wtq. looking for 700 to 800 whp.
|

August 5th, 2007, 11:02 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,718
|
|
|
Do yourself a favor and get a VTEC head. The B18B head just doesn't flow enough, even with port work.
Who is going to tune it? And what kind of fuel management are you going to have? Turbo?
|

August 5th, 2007, 11:07 PM
|
 |
CRXus Maximus Arelues
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North West NJ
Posts: 2,111
|
|
|
If you want that much power you're gonna need a lot more than you mentioned (I'm assuming you know). Secondary fuel pump, stupid big injectors, larger capacity fuel lines, VTEC head, real nice equal length manifold, most likly two waste gates, wicked fuel managment, and a real good tune.
...plus more.
|

August 6th, 2007, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
|
i have everything covered, but the vtec head. me and vtec dont get along. so we will see how far we can go on race gas, i need big #s for shows not for driving. figure tune it, run it, have all my #s and drop the boost to 450 to 500 for the daily and ill be happy.
i should have stated this to begin with sorry.
|

August 6th, 2007, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,718
|
|
|
I havn't seen a B18B head over 400hp... it's just cost prohibitive because the VTEC heads flow so much better.
I think you're going to be disapointed with your results because your goals are so high. 700 whp is not impossible but you have to have the right parts to even get near it and you're talking about the power range of low 10/high 9 second drag cars on average and people that spend years learning how to keep those motors together (along with researching how to find that horsepower).
Not trying to be a downer but i'd shoot for 600 just because that road map is so well done. I'm also curious to see the rest of the parts list just because.
|

August 6th, 2007, 05:37 PM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
|
ive had the pleasure helping build and rebuilding a 89crx pro outlaw from 99 to 01. best time was 8.2 1/4 mi. f20c 28lbs low boost 759whp no spray. been around the imoprts and built my frist 10sec. mopar at 15.
alright that was my claim to fame its all good but ive got some right builders for the job. im not doing the build myself. THIS BUILD anyways.
|

August 6th, 2007, 08:35 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadsdx
ive had the pleasure helping build and rebuilding a 89crx pro outlaw from 99 to 01. best time was 8.2 1/4 mi. f20c 28lbs low boost 759whp no spray.
|
what car?
|

August 6th, 2007, 10:39 PM
|
 |
Supercharged Samurai
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central, NJ
Posts: 603
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadsdx
ive had the pleasure helping build and rebuilding a 89crx pro outlaw from 99 to 01. best time was 8.2 1/4 mi. f20c 28lbs low boost 759whp no spray.
|
F20c...this crx was RWD? cuz it couldnt be FWD with that motor..thats the s2k motor?
__________________
02 psm wrx gt3076r
89 crx HF..SOLD!!!
|

August 7th, 2007, 12:23 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by triniskill
F20c...this crx was RWD? cuz it couldnt be FWD with that motor..thats the s2k motor?
|
...you missed the other 5 things wrong in that sentence. 
|

August 7th, 2007, 12:26 AM
|
 |
Hells Wind Staff
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 363
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadsdx
ive had the pleasure helping build and rebuilding a 89crx pro outlaw from 99 to 01. best time was 8.2 1/4 mi. f20c 28lbs low boost 759whp no spray. been around the imoprts and built my frist 10sec. mopar at 15.
alright that was my claim to fame its all good but ive got some right builders for the job. im not doing the build myself. THIS BUILD anyways.
|
If by '99-'01 you mean in about 3 hours on Forza 2. Then yes.
|

August 7th, 2007, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
s2000 powered rwd crx. ill have to dig through and find more pics and clips from the tracks.
|

August 7th, 2007, 12:11 PM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: westerville-oh
Posts: 12
|
|
|
i know to keep the mind clear when building and not to get the hopes up but i did say "looking for 700 to 800whp". then again i see everyone run b16, gsr and type r or ls/vtec. ill stick with the non vtec.
|

August 7th, 2007, 07:25 PM
|
 |
TJ Wanabe
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape, MO
Posts: 86
|
|
|
Have fun that non vtec head will be the death of you hopes.
__________________

'93 civic
Brad
|

November 9th, 2007, 05:01 PM
|
|
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Naperville/Chicago, Ill
Posts: 15
|
|
|
Good luck with that Buddy. Your gonna blow your motor going for 700 horsepower before you ever even get to drive it. just tune it well and make it as fast as as possible with your set-up. These are true bragging rights, extracting the most reliable power from a given set-up.
|

November 9th, 2007, 11:22 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gs-R-less in New York.
Posts: 1,081
|
|
|
I think you can use the non vtec head but youre gonna at minimum 5 angle valve job a massive port and polish, port match the header and the intake manifold to help with the flow issues. Some extremely aggressive cams. I think its possible. Not easy but possible.
__________________
|

November 11th, 2007, 06:21 AM
|
 |
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
Its kinda cool to see someone break from the norm and attempt something somewhat challenging - narrowly impossible. best of luck dadsdx post your results cause im really interested in how it turns out.  peace
|

November 12th, 2007, 01:29 PM
|
|
Fresh Meat
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Naperville/Chicago, Ill
Posts: 15
|
|
|
Sure, its possible but after changing the flow characteristics, and adding more agressive cams and increasing the engines rev range, all you have realy done is build a DOHC VTEC head in a very difficult way. Honda did it for you from th factory in a more reliable, more efficient package. go with a VTEC head. no?
|

November 13th, 2007, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gs-R-less in New York.
Posts: 1,081
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice78Transam
Sure, its possible but after changing the flow characteristics, and adding more agressive cams and increasing the engines rev range, all you have realy done is build a DOHC VTEC head in a very difficult way. Honda did it for you from th factory in a more reliable, more efficient package. go with a VTEC head. no?
|
I see what you are saying BUT i disagree. If you do all those things you still do not have a vtec. If he does all the work to the head im sure he is gonna keep a single profile cam set up and just get an extremely aggressive cam. that way there is no vtec cross over involved hence no vtec. If you put the two bear heads together they in no way shape or form look alike trust me. the vtec head looks like a beast next to the ls head.
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.
|